Back to Report Blocks
ScorecardHistory
Stakeholder
Report block
Summarizes starred score-version changes over a time window, with champion coverage, high-level change bullets, and optional evaluation gauge context.
What It Answers
- What changed across this scorecard in the requested window?
- Which changes were champion-related (all, some, or none)?
- What stakeholder/SME questions should we ask next?
Use When
- Preparing a weekly client update.
- Reviewing optimizer-driven changes across many scores.
- Explaining changes in stakeholder language before deep diff review.
Avoid When
- You only need champion transitions; use ScoreChampionVersionTimeline.
- You need item-level feedback rows; use RecentFeedback.
- No starred versions were created in the window; unchanged scores are intentionally omitted.
Run From The CLI
Direct report commands are the simplest path for one-off usage. Saved report configurations use `plexus report config create` and `plexus report run`.
plexus feedback report scorecard-history \
--scorecard "Customer Service QA" \
--days 10
# Single-score scope on the same scorecard.
plexus feedback report scorecard-history \
--scorecard "Customer Service QA" \
--score "Medication Review: Dosage" \
--days 10
# Explicit date range (instead of days).
plexus feedback report scorecard-history \
--scorecard "Customer Service QA" \
--start-date 2026-03-01 \
--end-date 2026-03-31return plexus.report.scorecard_history{
scorecard = "Customer Service QA",
days = 10,
sync = true
}plexus report config create --name "ScorecardHistory Example" --file scorecard-history.md
plexus report run --config "ScorecardHistory Example"Minimal Configuration
# Scorecard-wide scope
class: ScorecardHistory
scorecard: "Customer Service QA"
days: 10
# Single-score scope
class: ScorecardHistory
scorecard: "Customer Service QA"
score: "Medication Review: Dosage"
days: 10
# Explicit date range
class: ScorecardHistory
scorecard: "Customer Service QA"
start_date: "2026-03-01"
end_date: "2026-03-31"Live Rendered Example
Rendered with the same dashboard component used by generated reports.
ScorecardHistory Example
Customer Service QA
March 1, 2026 to March 31, 2026
History Summary
Some promoted
- What changed
- Three starred updates changed policy handling in dosage and transfer workflows.
- Guideline / rubric changes
- Dosage now requires explicit numeric dosage confirmation before a pass.
- Scoring behavior changes
- Transfer routing is stricter for unresolved medication risk scenarios.
- Questions for SMEs / stakeholders
- Should implied dosage ever qualify when no number is restated?
- Rollout and evidence
- Champion coverage is some; both recent-feedback and regression gauges are available for the latest included versions.
Scores Changed
2
Starred Versions
3
Champion Related
1
Champion Coverage
Some promoted
- Overview
- 2 starred versions were created in the window.
- Champion coverage: 1 were champion-related.
- Guidelines
- 2 included versions changed guideline text.
- Code / configuration
- 1 included version changed score configuration.
- Evaluations
- Gauge data is available for recent feedback and regression.
- Change notes
- Tightened dosage confirmation criteria.
- Clarified edge cases for inferred dosage language.
Guidelines
1
1 starred version changed rubric guidance.
Code
0
No code/config diff was detected in the included versions.
Champion
0
0 champion-related versions in this window.
Evaluations
2
Gauge data available for recent feedback and regression.
Change Notes
- 3/21/2026, 10:00:00 AMTightened dosage confirmation criteria.
How To Interpret It
- Only starred versions created inside the requested window are included.
- Scores with no in-window starred versions are intentionally omitted.
- Champion coverage is reported as all/some/none across included versions.
- Summary bullets are stakeholder-focused; use expanded diff panels for technical details.
- If both recent-feedback and regression evaluation data exist, gauges are shown with tabs.